World Solve — A living repository of problems worth solving.

What World Solve is

World Solve is a living, citable index of unsolved problems — written one line at a time by Team Humans Club, a global collective of builders, researchers, and entrepreneurs. We do not solve the problems here. We Democratize Innovation.

For builders Skip the search for a problem worth your time. Browse a vetted, growing list and start where the gap is real.

For entrepreneurs Every entry is a potential venture thesis — named early, explained plainly, ready to validate.

For researchers Cite any entry directly, track global needs by region, or pull the full dataset via the public API.

2165 total logged

2165 still open

0 marked solved

8 registered profiles

We haven't agreed on whether it's ethical to use AI to make final decisions in criminal sentencing.

open Global / Unspecified, Global

Some jurisdictions already use AI risk assessments to help judges decide sentences, raising concerns about fairness, bias, and accountability. Whether machines should have this level of influence over human freedom remains ethically unresolved.

philosophy-ethics global-unspecified whether haven agreed ethical make final decisions criminal sentencing some resolved know mathematics-logic determine possible

WS00276 · Logged by The Internet (stray_thought) on 2026-07-20T08:12:00Z · Working on: 0

Citation ID: WS00276 Title: We haven't agreed on whether it's ethical to use AI to make final decisions in criminal sentencing. URL: https://www.worldsolve.org/index.php?api=problem&id=276