Future infrastructure will increasingly rely on systems capable of making decisions without immediate human supervision. The unresolved problem is creating architectures that can prove what they did, explain uncertainty, fail safely, and remain controllable during abnormal conditions. The solution must produce useful coordination and accountability while minimizing collection of sensitive personal and behavioral data. The research opportunity is to define measurable success criteria, test the approach in realistic settings, identify failure modes, and create a pathway from prototype to accountable deployment.
Repository of problems worth solving
World Solve is a public institutional repository for identifying real unresolved problems across science, society, health, governance, economics, and local systems. Each entry is intended to be citable, inspectable, and actionable.
Future infrastructure will increasingly rely on systems capable of making decisions without immediate human supervision. The unresolved problem is creating architectures that can prove what they did, explain uncertainty, fail safely, and remain controllable during abnormal conditions. The design must remain functional when standards, trade routes, data access, and diplomatic cooperation are unreliable. The research opportunity is to define measurable success criteria, test the approach in realistic settings, identify failure modes, and create a pathway from prototype to accountable deployment.
Auditable autonomy in critical infrastructure for low-income communities
Future infrastructure will increasingly rely on systems capable of making decisions without immediate human supervision. The unresolved problem is creating architectures that can prove what they did, explain uncertainty, fail safely, and remain controllable during abnormal conditions. The solution must work with limited capital, intermittent services, and local maintenance capacity. The research opportunity is to define measurable success criteria, test the approach in realistic settings, identify failure modes, and create a pathway from prototype to accountable deployment.
We don't have a scalable way to prevent AI systems from generating misleading legal disclaimers that obscure real consumer rights.
Companies can use AI to generate legal language that's technically accurate but deliberately obscures consumers' actual rights, making it harder to understand what protections truly apply. Improving genuine clarity in these documents remains unresolved.
We haven't found a way to prevent large tech platforms from having near-total control over what apps can exist on their app stores.
A small number of companies control the primary channels through which most people discover and install mobile apps, giving them significant power over which businesses can reach customers at all. Balancing platform control with fair competition remains an unresolved policy issue.
We can't build content recommendation engines that fully avoid reinforcing filter bubbles around political topics.
Recommendation systems tend to show users more of what they already agree with because that content performs better for engagement, gradually narrowing exposure to differing viewpoints. Correcting for this without reducing relevance remains an unresolved design challenge.
We can't yet build robust, affordable cybersecurity protections specifically designed for medical devices implanted in patients.
Implanted medical devices like pacemakers increasingly connect wirelessly for monitoring, but security protections for these devices haven't kept pace with the sensitivity of what's at stake if they're compromised. Closing this gap remains an urgent but underaddressed challenge.
We don't have a scalable way to detect fake AI-generated product images used in online scams.
Scammers can now use AI to generate convincing images of products that don't exist or don't match what's actually shipped, making it harder for shoppers to identify fraudulent listings. Detection tools on marketplaces remain inconsistently effective.
We haven't solved how to prevent large AI companies from having outsized influence over what information the public sees.
As AI-powered search and assistants become primary ways people find information, a small number of companies effectively shape what most people see and believe. Ensuring this influence remains fair and transparent remains a largely unresolved governance issue.
We don't have a widely trusted way for users to control exactly what personal data mobile apps collect and share.
App permission systems exist, but many apps still collect more data than users realize or intend to allow, often through complex, hard-to-navigate settings. True granular control over personal data remains inconsistently implemented across platforms.
We can't build search algorithms that fully understand a user's actual intent rather than just matching keywords.
Search engines have improved at understanding context, but still frequently misinterpret nuanced or ambiguous queries, returning results that miss what the user actually wanted. True intent understanding remains an unresolved challenge in information retrieval.
We don't have a reliable, affordable way to verify the provenance of AI training data used by major tech companies.
It's often unclear exactly what data went into training a given AI model, making it difficult to audit for bias, copyright issues, or harmful content. Greater transparency into training data remains technically and legally unresolved.
We can't build AI systems that reliably know the limits of their own knowledge.
AI models often can't accurately tell when a question falls outside what they actually know, leading them to guess confidently rather than admit uncertainty. Teaching AI to recognize its own limits remains an unresolved research problem.
We can't yet build quantum computers stable enough to run useful programs at scale.
Qubits are extremely sensitive to their environment and lose their quantum state within fractions of a second, limiting what any quantum computer can currently do. Solving this instability is the main barrier between quantum computing's promise and its practical use.
We still do not know what dark matter actually is.
Astronomical observations demand extra unseen mass, but candidate particles from extensions of the Standard Model remain undetected. New detector designs, astrophysical surveys, and theoretical models are needed to pin down its nature.
We still do not fully understand how supermassive black holes form and grow.
Observations show billion-solar-mass black holes early in cosmic history, which standard growth models struggle to explain. Improved surveys of high-redshift quasars and simulations of direct-collapse scenarios are needed.
Characterizing the small-scale structure of dark matter halos remains difficult.
Simulations predict substructure that observations only partly confirm. Strong lensing and stellar stream measurements can probe these scales.
We do not fully understand the cosmic reionization history.
Timing and sources of reionization remain uncertain. 21cm experiments and high-z galaxy observations can map it.
Rapid urban migration combined with limited land supply is pushing housing prices far beyond what average incomes can support. Modular and prefabricated housing ventures could help increase affordable supply faster.
The origin of primordial supermassive black holes in the early universe is unexplained.
Observations show massive black holes existing just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang, far too fast for standard accretion models. Direct collapse seed theories or primordial black hole physics need verification.