Repository of problems worth solving
World Solve is a public institutional repository for identifying real unresolved problems across science, society, health, governance, economics, and local systems. Each entry is intended to be citable, inspectable, and actionable.
Publicly citable
Every problem has a stable citation code for reference and discussion.
Filtered by relevance
Search by category, geography, status, and keywords.
Builder-oriented
Use the repository to find startup ideas, policy leads, and research agendas.
4194Total
4194Open
0Solved
9Humans
When digital systems fail, public trust in records, payments, and eligibility can collapse. The challenge is designing governance that can preserve continuity, recover data, and verify truth across technical interruptions. This becomes particularly difficult in informal settlements, because public institutions must remain fair, resilient, and accountable while adapting to new risks.
society-governance
trust
data
informal
settlements
building
state
during
frequent
system
outages
public
systems
technology-computing
institutions
governance
As benefits move online, errors can become opaque and difficult to reverse. The challenge is creating fast, accessible grievance systems that help ordinary people correct eligibility mistakes without requiring legal expertise. The challenge is especially acute in informal settlements, where legacy systems, coordination failures, and weak oversight can magnify harm.
technology-computing
asia
indonesia
systems
grievance
informal
settlements
trustworthy
redress
digital
welfare
benefits
move
society-governance
public
climate-environment
across
economics-resources
open
Global / Unspecified, Global
Mistakes in identity documents, tax records, or benefit eligibility can take months or years to fix, causing real harm in the meantime. A faster, more citizen-friendly correction process remains missing in most bureaucracies.
society-governance
global-unspecified
records
citizens
countries
have
simple
way
correct
errors
official
government
whether
philosophy-ethics
resolved
determine
don
agreed
open
Global / Unspecified, Global
When an algorithm denies someone benefits or flags them as a risk, it's often unclear who is responsible for reviewing or correcting that decision. This accountability gap grows as governments rely more heavily on automated systems.
technology-computing
global-unspecified
often
accountability
government
decisions
like
welfare
eligibility
policing
lacks
clear
society-governance
systems
intergenerational
public
whether
philosophy-ethics
Build accessible, time-bound, auditable mechanisms for people wrongly denied benefits, especially where automated eligibility systems create opaque errors.
society-governance
asia
india
systems
improving
grievance
redress
welfare
build
accessible
time-bound
auditable
mechanisms
technology-computing
economics-resources
climate-environment
global-unspecified
public
